Managed receivables vs AR software vs debt collection
There are three common ways to handle invoices that aren't being paid. AR software automates reminders but leaves the work and the relationship risk with you. Debt collection is a last resort that arrives after a payment has gone bad, takes a percentage, and usually ends the relationship. Managed receivables sits between them: a neutral party runs every invoice from issuance, for a flat fee, designed so you get paid faster without losing the customer.
| AR software | Debt collection | Managed receivables (ChaseFlow) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | You (it automates reminders) | The agency | A neutral party — fully delegated |
| When it starts | Whenever you set it up | After a payment has gone bad | From the day the invoice is issued |
| Relationship impact | Yours to manage | Usually ends it | Preserved — contact comes from a neutral mediator |
| Cost model | Subscription per seat/feature | 15–30% of what's recovered | Flat fee per invoice — never a % |
| Holds your money? | No | Often yes | No — your customer pays you directly |
| Best for | Teams that want to keep doing it themselves, faster | Debts already considered lost | Businesses that want the function off their desk |
The three aren't really competitors — they're different moments. Managed receivables is the only one that works before things go wrong, which is why it's the one that keeps you out of the other two.
Frequently asked questions
Is managed receivables cheaper than a collection agency?+
Almost always — a collection agency takes a percentage of what it recovers, while managed receivables is a flat per-invoice fee, so your cost doesn't scale with the invoice size.
Can't AR software do the same thing?+
AR software automates the reminders, but you still operate it and you're still the one applying the pressure. Managed receivables removes the work and the relationship risk entirely.
See it before you decide.
Related: What is managed receivables? · How to reduce DSO
